Make the Road New York and Make the Road Connecticut v. DHS, Civil Action

Last update: Sep 17, 2024 Filing Location: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

This lawsuit sought and secured information, under the Freedom of Information Act, from the Trump administration pertaining to its process and decision to terminate the DACA program.

Case Number: 18-cv-2445

Case Overview

Just days after the Trump administration’s attempt to terminate DACA in 2017, the National Immigration Law Center submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on behalf of two immigrants’ rights organizations, seeking information and records related to the Trump administration’s decision-making around and implementation of the rescission of DACA, including any intervening changes to how DACA was being administered. When the government failed to produce a single responsive document after six months, NILC filed suit to compel the Trump administration to comply with FOIA’s requirements and to disclose the records sought.   

NILC has aggressively litigated the case since then, including briefing a motion for summary judgment, which has resulted in the government’s disclosure of more than 16,000 pages of responsive documents. These documents provide critical insights into the Trump administration’s decision-making process to end DACA.  They also give a greater understanding of DACA applicant information sharing practices within the various components of DHS—a longstanding concern and focus of our clients and the larger immigrant rights movement.   

After over five years of litigation, NILC is engaged in active negotiations with the federal government while the proceedings are stayed to resolve this case without further litigation.

Records from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security

Related
What does the BIA Decision Mean for DACA recipients?

What does the BIA Decision Mean for DACA recipients?

Diana Pliego and Kevin Siegel

Published Apr 30, 2026 If someone with DACA gets arrested and detained by immigration or other law enforcement and ends up before an immigration judge, the judge may now look into their case more closely to comply with the BIA decision. However, the decision does not...

The Dignity Act of 2025: An Outdated and Harmful Approach to Immigration Reform

The Dignity Act of 2025: An Outdated and Harmful Approach to Immigration Reform

Published Apr 28, 2026 This resource answers frequently asked questions about the Dignity Act of 2025 (H.R. 4393) which was introduced in July 2025.

La ley Dignidad de 2025: un enfoque anticuado y dañino acerca de la reforma migratoria

La ley Dignidad de 2025: un enfoque anticuado y dañino acerca de la reforma migratoria

Published Apr 26, 2026 Este recurso responde a las preguntas más frecuentes sobre la Ley de Dignidad de 2025 (H.R. 4393), presentada en julio de 2025.

State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Texas and other states sued the federal government to stop the Keeping Families Together Parole in Place policy, which allows eligible noncitizens to apply for work authorization and adjustment of status in the U.S. without having to leave the...

Last update: Apr 6, 2026