What does the BIA Decision Mean for DACA recipients?

Apr 30, 2026 Although the Board of Immigration Appeals recently made a decision that sounded the alarm for many DACA recipients, DACA protections are still in place.

On April 24, the Board of Immigration Appeals made a decision about an immigration case that sounded the alarm for many Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients.

Typically, a person in removal proceedings can ask the judge to “terminate” those proceedings for a number of reasons, including their DACA status. In this case, the immigration judge ended the removal case because the person had DACA. The judge did not otherwise address the government’s reasons for seeking deportation. This is something immigration judges have regularly done for years, and the BIA has not questioned their decisions. However, when the government appealed this case to the BIA, the BIA judges sided with the government and said the immigration judge should have explicitly considered the government’s reasons for seeking deportation and included it in the written decision.

DACA can still be the reason that an immigration judge terminates a case, but the BIA told the immigration judge to make sure to include other factors like the government’s point of view. Because the BIA sets precedent in immigration cases nationally, this new decision has caused great concern for immigration advocates and DACA recipients, who fear that their protections under DACA are no longer in place. But that is not the case.

What does this mean for DACA and DACA recipients?

To be clear: the BIA’s decision does not take away any protections that DACA provides right now. It does not give the government more power to place someone in removal proceedings, and it does not allow the Department of Homeland Security to actually deport someone with valid deferred action status. However, if someone with DACA gets arrested and detained by immigration or other law enforcement and ends up before an immigration judge, the judge may now look into their case more closely to comply with the BIA decision. Because of this, it could be harder for them to get their case closed just because they have DACA.

Even though this decision is about how immigration judges handle cases when someone has DACA, we know it is another attempt by this administration to slash away at DACA specifically. Still, DACA remains in place, and it still protects people from deportation.

What can DACA recipients do now?

It’s more important than ever to get accurate information and know your rights. While we have seen some DACA recipients get caught up in this administration’s detention and deportation efforts, we have also seen DACA recipients released from detention and, in some cases, even returned home after unlawful and unjust deportations. If you are a DACA recipient and you end up in removal proceedings, do not give up. DACA still means protection from deportation, and we have seen what can happen when you fight back.

Helpful resources are listed below:

Related
NILC Responds to SCOTUS Decisions on TPS and Asylum

NILC Responds to SCOTUS Decisions on TPS and Asylum

Published Jun 25, 2026 Kica Matos, president of the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), issued the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court issued rulings clearing the way for the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and...

The US Must Keep its Promises to LGBTQ+ Immigrants

The US Must Keep its Promises to LGBTQ+ Immigrants

Elizabeth Choo

Published Jun 22, 2026 The government’s refusal to provide humanitarian relief to transgender immigrants is just one of the ways the Trump administration is attacking the LGBTQ+ community.

What’s in Congress’s New ICE Funding Law?

What’s in Congress’s New ICE Funding Law?

Heidi Altman and Ben D’Avanzo

Published Jun 11, 2026

Tell USCIS You Don’t Want Increased Immigrant Surveillance

Tell USCIS You Don’t Want Increased Immigrant Surveillance

Sarah Krieger

Published Jun 10, 2026 Updating an address should not require people to share unrelated personal and financial information with the federal government. Public comment is open until July 6 to oppose the change to Form...