USCIS Publishes Notice Confirming Restoration of DACA, Following Class-Action Lawsuit Victory

Dec 7, 2020

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 7, 2020

CONTACT
Juan Gastelum, [email protected], 213-375-3149
Yatziri Tovar, [email protected], 917-771-2818
Ramis Wadood, [email protected], 203-432-4800

USCIS Publishes Notice Confirming Restoration of DACA, Following Class-Action Lawsuit Victory

NEW YORK — Following Friday’s federal court decision in the Batalla Vidal v. Wolf lawsuit, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has updated its website with a notice confirming that Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) has been restored in full to its pre-2017 form. Now, for the first time since the Trump administration tried to end DACA in 2017, USCIS is again accepting applications from first-time applicants and applications for advance parole (permission to leave the country and reenter) for humanitarian, educational, and employment purposes. As a result of Friday’s decision, work authorization will again be issued in two-year intervals.

This action follows the court’s finding that Chad Wolf, who claimed to be the acting secretary of Homeland Security, did not have the legal authority to issue the July 2020 memorandum dismantling DACA, because he was unlawfully appointed.

After the Supreme Court in June struck down the Trump administration’s unlawful attempt to terminate DACA, Wolf issued a memorandum blocking first-time DACA applications, cutting renewals from two years to one, and drastically reducing the ability of DACA recipients to travel abroad on advance parole. In August, DACA-eligible youth, first-time applicants, and DACA recipients filed a legal challenge against the memo, arguing that it unlawfully and drastically altered the program and that it was issued without legal authority. On November 14, the court sided with the plaintiffs.

In addition, the court granted the plaintiffs’ request to be certified as the representatives of a nationwide class of approximately one million DACA-eligible individuals across the country. Class members can sign up to receive informative updates at dacaclassaction.org.

“Today, after waiting nearly three years, I will finally be able to apply for DACA,” said Ximena Zamora, member of Make the Road New York and plaintiff in Batalla Vidal v. Wolf lawsuit. “In 2017, I was robbed of the opportunity to be able to apply because DACA was wrongly terminated and, then again, in July when the Trump administration issued a memo blocking first time applicants like me. As a recent high school graduate, I want to be able to continue my studies, work to help support my family, and live without fear of being separated from my loved ones. I am excited to submit my DACA application as soon as possible.”

The Trump administration’s onslaught on immigrants and immigrant youth has put us at risk. Since their first attempt to end DACA, we have fought in the streets and in the courts, and we have proven once again that DACA should continue as it was before Trump tried to terminate it,” said Sonia Molina, member of Make the Road New York and plaintiff in the Batalla Vidal v. Wolf lawsuit whose DACA renewal application is pending. “As I now wait for my two-year DACA renewal, I know our fight is not over. We must continue to fight and organize to ensure permanent protections for all DACA recipients, temporary protected status (TPS) holders, and all undocumented people across the country.”

“For the first time in over three years, the government has finally confirmed what the law has always required: that it will accept first-time applications for DACA,” said Ramis Wadood, a law student intern with the Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization at Yale Law School, “Our plaintiffs have fought to keep DACA open since the beginning of the Trump presidency, and they will continue fighting for their community to be safe from deportation.”

“Our victories against the Trump administration are a testament to the courage, resilience and power of immigrant communities and the movement for immigrant justice — especially our brave and indefatigable plaintiffs who have remained steadfast in securing justice for themselves and others. Their home is here,” said Araceli Martínez-Olguín, a supervising attorney with the National Immigration Law Center.

While the government may appeal the decision and another federal judge in Texas may rule in a separate DACA case in the coming month, all eligible individuals are encouraged to consult with an immigration attorney about applying. For further information on the case and for forthcoming resources for class members, visit dacaclassaction.org.

The named plaintiffs in Batalla Vidal v. Wolf are Martín Batalla Vidal, Antonio Alarcón, Eliana Fernandez, Carolina Fung Feng, Carlos Vargas, Johana Larios, M.B.F., Ximena Zamora, Sonia Molina, and Make the Road New York. The class is represented by the Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization at Yale Law School, Make the Road New York, and the National Immigration Law Center.

Related
What does the BIA Decision Mean for DACA recipients?

What does the BIA Decision Mean for DACA recipients?

Diana Pliego and Kevin Siegel

Published Apr 30, 2026 If someone with DACA gets arrested and detained by immigration or other law enforcement and ends up before an immigration judge, the judge may now look into their case more closely to comply with the BIA decision. However, the decision does not...

The Dignity Act of 2025: An Outdated and Harmful Approach to Immigration Reform

The Dignity Act of 2025: An Outdated and Harmful Approach to Immigration Reform

Published Apr 28, 2026 This resource answers frequently asked questions about the Dignity Act of 2025 (H.R. 4393) which was introduced in July 2025.

La ley Dignidad de 2025: un enfoque anticuado y dañino acerca de la reforma migratoria

La ley Dignidad de 2025: un enfoque anticuado y dañino acerca de la reforma migratoria

Published Apr 26, 2026 Este recurso responde a las preguntas más frecuentes sobre la Ley de Dignidad de 2025 (H.R. 4393), presentada en julio de 2025.

State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Texas and other states sued the federal government to stop the Keeping Families Together Parole in Place policy, which allows eligible noncitizens to apply for work authorization and adjustment of status in the U.S. without having to leave the...

Last update: Apr 6, 2026