LGML v. Noem

Last update: Feb 25, 2026 Filing Location: U.S. District Court, District of Columbia

This lawsuit seeks to stop the Trump administration from unlawfully expelling hundreds of unaccompanied Guatemalan children from the United States.

Update: On Aug. 31, the district court issued an emergency Temporary Restraining Order preventing the government from removing any Guatemalan unaccompanied minor in U.S. custody for 14 days.


Case Overview

This lawsuit seeks to stop the Trump administration from unlawfully expelling hundreds of unaccompanied Guatemalan children from the United States. NILC is seeking class certification and an emergency temporary restraining order to prevent the minors’ imminent unlawful removal after the administration reportedly reached an agreement with the Guatemalan government to return the children, who are currently in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR).  

Under federal law, the government must provide migrant children without a parent or legal guardian in the U.S. with access to legal counsel and cannot place them in expedited removal except in limited circumstances, which do not apply to Guatemalan children. Because unaccompanied minors are uniquely vulnerable to coercion, an immigration judge must approve their voluntary return to their home countries.  

The Trump administration’s unlawful plan to deport the children violates these longstanding protections under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorizations Act (TVPRA), federal legislation that passed in 2008 with rare, overwhelming bipartisan support. The plan also violates the children’s Constitutional right to due process and the Constitution’s protections against discrimination based on national origin. 

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of ten individual minors. The lead plaintiff in the case, L.G.M.L, is an indigenous girl whose mother passed away and who suffered abuse and neglect at the hands of other family members in Guatemala.

Legal Documents

Related
CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Aug 26, 2026

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Published Aug 26, 2026 Immigrant families, workers, and legal assistance groups harmed by the Trump administration’s 75-country ban on immigrant visas filed an emergency motion to enforce Friday’s court order and judgment in CLINIC v....

Federal Court Strikes Down Trump’s Discriminatory 75-Country Visa Ban

Federal Court Strikes Down Trump’s Discriminatory 75-Country Visa Ban

Published Aug 21, 2026 In a major victory for families, fairness, and the rule of law, a federal court in New York struck down the Trump administration’s blanket, nationality-based “public charge” ban on immigrant visa processing for people from 75...

Community Alert: Traveling on “advance parole” now triggers 3- and 10-year bars

Community Alert: Traveling on “advance parole” now triggers 3- and 10-year bars

Published Aug 17, 2026 The Board of Immigration Appeals has changed the consequences of traveling on “advance parole.” If you are thinking about traveling outside the U.S. on “advance parole” and you have been in the U.S. without permission for 180+ days, now...