LGML v. Noem

Last update: Sep 21, 2026 Filing Location: U.S. District Court, District of Columbia

This lawsuit seeks to stop the Trump administration from unlawfully expelling hundreds of unaccompanied Guatemalan children from the United States.

Update: On Aug. 31, the district court issued an emergency Temporary Restraining Order preventing the government from removing any Guatemalan unaccompanied minor in U.S. custody for 14 days.


Case Overview

This lawsuit seeks to stop the Trump administration from unlawfully expelling hundreds of unaccompanied Guatemalan children from the United States. NILC is seeking class certification and an emergency temporary restraining order to prevent the minors’ imminent unlawful removal after the administration reportedly reached an agreement with the Guatemalan government to return the children, who are currently in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR).

Under federal law, the government must provide migrant children without a parent or legal guardian in the U.S. with access to legal counsel and cannot place them in expedited removal except in limited circumstances, which do not apply to Guatemalan children. Because unaccompanied minors are uniquely vulnerable to coercion, an immigration judge must approve their voluntary return to their home countries.

The Trump administration’s unlawful plan to deport the children violates these longstanding protections under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorizations Act (TVPRA), federal legislation that passed in 2008 with rare, overwhelming bipartisan support. The plan also violates the children’s Constitutional right to due process and the Constitution’s protections against discrimination based on national origin.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of ten individual minors. The lead plaintiff in the case, L.G.M.L, is an indigenous girl whose mother passed away and who suffered abuse and neglect at the hands of other family members in Guatemala.

Legal Documents

Related
Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Oct 6, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Oct 1, 2026

CLINIC v. Rubio: The 75-Country Visa Pause Was Vacated. What Happens Now?

CLINIC v. Rubio: The 75-Country Visa Pause Was Vacated. What Happens Now?

Published Sep 30, 2026 A practical roadmap, created by CLINIC, for immigrant visa applicants and their legal representatives.

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Published Sep 2, 2026 El 13 de agosto de 2026, el tribunal de apelaciones de los Estados Unidos (la Junta de Apelaciones de Inmigración, o “BIA” por sus siglas en inglés) cambió las consecuencias de viajar con un “permiso adelantado.” Lee este recurso...