Groups File Federal Lawsuit Over Tennessee’s New Extreme Anti-Immigrant Law

Jun 4, 2026

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 4, 2026

CONTACT
Juan Gastelum, NILC, [email protected]
Inga Sarda-Sorensen, ACLU, 347-514-3984, [email protected]
Dr. Cathryn Stout, ACLU of Tennessee, [email protected]

Groups File Federal Lawsuit Over Tennessee’s New Extreme Anti-Immigrant Law

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The National Immigration Law Center, American Civil Liberties Union, and ACLU of Tennessee filed a federal class-action lawsuit today challenging a new Tennessee law, HB 1704, that unconstitutionally usurps federal immigration enforcement power by making it a crime for certain immigrants to remain in the state.

Courts across the country have repeatedly reaffirmed that immigration enforcement is a power that belongs exclusively to the federal government — not the states.

Tennessee’s law, however, creates a new crime for people with final removal orders who have not left the state. HB 1704 is part of a larger framework of new extreme anti-immigration state laws aimed at criminalizing noncitizens’ presence within a state either by punishing entry, or in this case, lack of departure.

“HB 1704 does exactly what courts have warned states not to do for decades. It is a cruel and unlawful attempt to punish people just for living in Tennessee, and the state has no authority to enact this new law,” said Peter McGraw, deputy legal director at the National Immigration Law Center.

“The rule has been clear for well over a century: Immigration enforcement is exclusively a federal power. The state’s overreach here is unlawful and inhumane, creating fear and upending lives for families, neighbors, and communities across Tennessee,” said Hannah Steinberg, staff attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project.

Plaintiffs in this case include:

  • A 35-year-old Memphis resident who came to the United States on a visa when he was very young. His family applied for asylum, but the application was denied, and he was ordered removed when he was a teenager. He later applied for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and has had DACA ever since. He has lived in Memphis for decades and fears he will now be arrested, detained, and prosecuted under the state’s new failure-to-depart law.
  • A 58-year-old woman who arrived in the United States a quarter century ago on a visitor’s visa. After she applied for asylum, her application was denied and she was issued a removal order. She has applied for relief under the Violence Against Women Act. For the past 25 years, she has lived in Memphis. Her entire life is in Tennessee — her sons, including one U.S. citizen son who is starting college and she financially supports; her job, where she has worked for decades; her doctors and immigration lawyer; and her friends and neighbors. She too now lives in fear.

“HB 1704 would threaten our neighbors who have families here and have lived here for years,” said Zee Scout, staff attorney at the ACLU of Tennessee. “This is yet another example of the state of Tennessee improperly wielding its power to baselessly attack neighbors and families who make this a better, richer state for all. We are filing this case to defend our communities against this unconstitutional law.”

The lawsuit seeks to block the new law from taking effect on July 1.

The complaint is here.

###

Related
CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Sep 11, 2026

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Sep 2, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Published Sep 2, 2026 El 13 de agosto de 2026, el tribunal de apelaciones de los Estados Unidos (la Junta de Apelaciones de Inmigración, o “BIA” por sus siglas en inglés) cambió las consecuencias de viajar con un “permiso adelantado.” Lee este recurso...

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Published Aug 26, 2026 Immigrant families, workers, and legal assistance groups harmed by the Trump administration’s 75-country ban on immigrant visas filed an emergency motion to enforce Friday’s court order and judgment in CLINIC v....