Padres Unidos de Tulsa v. Drummond

Last update: Oct 30, 2024 Filing Location: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Case challenging the constitutionality of Oklahoma’s HB 4156, a law which seeks to usurp federal authority to regulate immigration.

Case Number: 5:24-cv-00511-J
Enforcement Racial Justice
Featured Downloads

Update:  In June 2024, the Court temporarily blocked HB 4156, which was set to take effect on July 1. It is now on hold as the case is litigated. NILC’s lawsuit has been consolidated with the federal government’s challenge to HB 4156 in United States v. State of Oklahoma.


Case Overview

In May 2024, the National Immigration Law Center and co-counsels filed a lawsuit, challenging Oklahoma’s law, HB 4156, as unconstitutional. In this case, we represent the Oklahoma-based organization Padres Unidos, and an individual plaintiff who came to the United States nearly 20 years ago as a 1-year-old.

HB 4156 conflicts with existing immigration laws by usurping federal control over the immigration system, regulating people’s entry into the United States, and banishing people from Oklahoma who have a federal right to remain here. Under HB 4156, entire categories of immigrants would be barred from entering the state, or could be ordered to leave, even if they are pursuing asylum or other lawful immigration status.

In this case, our plaintiff has lived in Oklahoma her whole life and her entire family — including her parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and U.S.-citizen siblings — all live nearby. She could be prosecuted and removed from Oklahoma under this new law and separated from her entire family and the only place she has called home.

HB 4156 is based largely on S.B. 4, the Texas immigration law that NILC has also challenged in a separate case.

Legal Documents

With this new law, the state’s politicians are forcing Oklahoma’s immigrant communities into an impossible choice — to either leave the state and the families they care for behind or face nonsensical criminal sanctions.
Nicholas Espíritu

NILC Deputy Legal Director

Related
CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Sep 11, 2026

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Sep 2, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Published Sep 2, 2026 El 13 de agosto de 2026, el tribunal de apelaciones de los Estados Unidos (la Junta de Apelaciones de Inmigración, o “BIA” por sus siglas en inglés) cambió las consecuencias de viajar con un “permiso adelantado.” Lee este recurso...

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Published Aug 26, 2026 Immigrant families, workers, and legal assistance groups harmed by the Trump administration’s 75-country ban on immigrant visas filed an emergency motion to enforce Friday’s court order and judgment in CLINIC v....