What States Can Do to Mitigate the Harm If DACA, TPS, and Other Forms of Immigration Relief End

Jul 13, 2020

The Trump administration has systematically made it more difficult for non–U.S. citizens who’ve lived in the U.S. for years, even decades, to obtain immigration relief. Two avenues to relief, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and temporary protected status (TPS), have allowed hundreds of thousands of community members across the country to thrive. Yet DACA and TPS are under threat. They remain available only because of effective advocacy, organizing, and court orders. The option to request DACA and the designations of some countries as countries whose citizens and former residents are eligible for TPS have been kept in place only because of orders issued by federal courts. Even the reprieve resulting from the June 28, 2020, U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing DACA to remain available may be temporary if the Trump administration attempts to terminate DACA again.

Forms of immigration relief, such as DACA and TPS, that don’t include a pathway to U.S. citizenship are themselves assailable when an administration is hostile to immigration and immigrants, and they leave the people who benefit from them perpetually vulnerable. Despite the fact that DACA and TPS have allowed some immigrants to thrive, these temporary forms of relief can always be taken away. Congress’s failure to create a permanent solution for people currently eligible for DACA and TPS leaves families and communities at risk of their members being deported, forced to leave their homes. Deportations almost inevitably split families apart, causing long-term harm, in multiple ways, to local communities.

But the present administration’s hostility to immigrants and Congress’s failure to create permanent solutions are only part of the story. States, counties, and cities, recognizing the importance of their community members, have created immigrant-inclusive policies and programs. The federal-level immigration crisis offers an opportunity for state and local advocates and policymakers to assess what can be done to support immigrant communities. Since immigration relief is fluid and sometimes fickle, how can localities support their residents regardless of their immigration status? A person’s connection to home and community doesn’t change when their immigration status changes. How can state and local policies reach individuals in the places they live and have an immediate, if incremental, impact on their lives? How can they ensure that a person’s immigration status doesn’t prevent them from thriving.

The purpose of this report is to present tangible policy opportunities that state and local advocates can fight for in their communities. If we all are to thrive together, we need more durable campaigns that support all residents regardless of their immigration status. Campaigns to make driver’s licenses and health care available for all could make a big difference. The policies described here are presented as part of a continuum, based on what may be appropriate for different communities. In some cases, they are more immediate, initial steps toward transformative change. The threat that DACA and TPS might be taken away presents an opportunity for states and localities to come together to find enduring solutions that minimize harm and protect the health and well-being of everyone who lives in them.

*For footnotes and bibliography, please reference the PDF version of this resource below.

Read More
The Latest
The Orantes Injunction: Protections for Detained Salvadorans After a Worksite Raid

The Orantes Injunction: Protections for Detained Salvadorans After a Worksite Raid

Sep 12, 2024 Information for attorneys and legal workers representing persons detained in immigration worksite raids (or in any enforcement action) about the Orantes' permanent injunction.

Pathways to Citizenship for DACA Recipients: Legislative Updates & Analysis

Pathways to Citizenship for DACA Recipients: Legislative Updates & Analysis

Sep 1, 2024 NILC continues to urge Congress to pass a pathway to citizenship for immigrant youth who call this country home, so they can enjoy the same peace and stability that we all need to thrive. Part of that work involves monitoring and analyzing the...

Frequently Asked Questions: The Orantes Injunction

Frequently Asked Questions: The Orantes Injunction

Sep 1, 2024 The Orantes injunction is a nationwide, permanent injunction requiring DHS to uphold certain rights of Salvadoran nationals in asylum proceedings. Originally published in November...

Padres Unidos de Tulsa v. Drummond

Padres Unidos de Tulsa v. Drummond

Case challenging the constitutionality of Oklahoma’s HB 4156, a law which seeks to usurp federal authority to regulate immigration.

Last update: Aug 29, 2024