FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 17, 2025
CONTACT
Juan Gastelum, 213-375-3149, [email protected]
[email protected]
Tennessee Court Blocks Unlawful National Guard Deployment in Memphis
Ruling Affirms Limits on Executive Power, Protects Civilian Rule of Law
Memphis, TN — A Tennessee court today ruled that Governor Bill Lee’s deployment of the National Guard to Memphis—initiated at President Trump’s request—was unlawful, reaffirming that state and federal leaders cannot use military forces to police American cities in violation of Tennessee law.
The ruling halts the deployment, declaring that the Governor acted beyond his authority. The court found that there had been neither a “grave emergency” nor a “disaster” nor a request from local officials, as required by law.
The case was brought by a coalition of local and state leaders, including Shelby County Mayor Lee Harris, Memphis City Councilmember JB Smiley, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners Henri E. Brooks and Erika Sugarmon, State Representatives G.A. Hardaway and Gabby Salinas, and State Senator Jeff Yarbro. The coalition is represented by Democracy Forward, National Immigration Law Center, and Sherrard Roe Voigt & Harbison, PLC.
The coalition of plaintiffs issued the following joint statement:
“We brought this case because Tennesseans deserve leaders who follow the law, respect our Constitution, and protect—not undermine—our democratic institutions. Today’s ruling makes clear that no governor or president can deploy military force into our communities without legal authority, public accountability, or a genuine emergency. Military power must never be used as a political tool. Memphis deserves public safety, community investment, and democratic decision-making—not unlawful militarization. We are grateful that the court upheld the rule of law and protected our residents, strengthened civilian leadership, and reaffirmed that state power must always be exercised within constitutional limits.”
The case is Mayor Lee Harris, et al. v. Governor Bill Lee, et al.
CLINIC v. Rubio
This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.
Last update: Sep 11, 2026
Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California
Updated Sep 2, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...
Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años
Published Sep 2, 2026 El 13 de agosto de 2026, el tribunal de apelaciones de los Estados Unidos (la Junta de Apelaciones de Inmigración, o “BIA” por sus siglas en inglés) cambió las consecuencias de viajar con un “permiso adelantado.” Lee este recurso...
Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban
Published Aug 26, 2026 Immigrant families, workers, and legal assistance groups harmed by the Trump administration’s 75-country ban on immigrant visas filed an emergency motion to enforce Friday’s court order and judgment in CLINIC v....