Perez-Funez, et al. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Last update: Apr 21, 2026 Filing Location: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

This lawsuit established the basic procedural safeguards that all unaccompanied children must receive to prevent their unlawful removal from the United States.

Case Overview

In 1985, a federal court ordered the federal government to provide unaccompanied children with basic procedural safeguards to prevent their unlawful removal from the United States. As a result of this order, unaccompanied children continue to receive written notice of the right to a hearing in immigration court and access to a telephone to call a responsible adult or lawyer.

In December 2025, the Trump administration filed a motion asking the federal court to terminate this court order. They argue that new laws make the court order unnecessary, and they promise to give children a different written notice that, according to them, better explains their legal options. But a notice created by the Trump administration threatens children with “prolonged” detention if they seek a hearing with an Immigration Judge or even express fear of returning to their home country.

NILC, along with Public Counsel, attorney Gilbert Carrasco, and the law firms Quinn Emanuel Sullivan Urquhart & Sullivan, and Cohen Millstein Sellers & Toll, are defending the court order to ensure that unaccompanied children continue to receive the basic protections to which they have been entitled for more than 40 years.

For legal inquiries, please contact [email protected]

Related
Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Sep 2, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Published Sep 2, 2026 El 13 de agosto de 2026, el tribunal de apelaciones de los Estados Unidos (la Junta de Apelaciones de Inmigración, o “BIA” por sus siglas en inglés) cambió las consecuencias de viajar con un “permiso adelantado.” Lee este recurso...

CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Aug 26, 2026

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Published Aug 26, 2026 Immigrant families, workers, and legal assistance groups harmed by the Trump administration’s 75-country ban on immigrant visas filed an emergency motion to enforce Friday’s court order and judgment in CLINIC v....