Plyler and Data Collection

Jan 13, 2025 This factsheet provides information on how schools play a vital role in safeguarding family data during the enrollment and administrative process.

Equal Access to Education for All is a Constitutional Right

All children living in the U.S., regardless of their immigration status, have the right to equal access to education. In Plyler v. Doe (1982), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution for a state to discriminate against undocumented children by denying them access to that state’s system of free public education.

Data Collection

The primary function of our schools is to give all children an opportunity to learn, thrive, and be fully integrated into our communities and our democracy. To fulfill these functions, it is essential that routine administrative processes, school enrollment, are not done in a way that chills access to education and potentially infringes on the rights Plyler provides. For example, including questions about students’ and parents’ immigration statuses may cause them to hesitate to continue the enrollment process, fearing that answering these questions will lead to them being reported to immigration enforcement. For this reason, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that laws requiring reporting on the immigration status of students can violate Plyler. Similarly, the Department of Education has issued guidance that this kind of data collection is unnecessary and may be illegal if it is done “with the purpose or result of denying access to public schools on the basis of race, color, or national origin.” We encourage you to review guidance related to access to education for undocumented students and best enrollment practices produced by the Department of Education.

What can schools do?

Schools can do their part to ensure that they only collect the information they need to enroll a student or administer a specific program without asking for unnecessary information that intentionally or unintentionally chills access to educational opportunities. We recommend schools evaluate what information they are collecting, for what purpose, how long they need to keep these records, who has access to the data, and what data protections are in place to protect the data (e.g. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

The Latest
Immigrant and Refugee Children: A Guide for Educators and School Support Staff

Immigrant and Refugee Children: A Guide for Educators and School Support Staff

May 29, 2025 This guide, created in partnership with United We Dream, CLASP, KIND, and the AFT, is intended for educators, school support staff, and service providers who teach, mentor, and help open doors of opportunity for immigrant students and their...

Education for All Campaign Steering Committee Members Celebrate Defeat of Bill Aimed at Stripping Education from Tennessee Kids Based on Their Immigration Status

Education for All Campaign Steering Committee Members Celebrate Defeat of Bill Aimed at Stripping Education from Tennessee Kids Based on Their Immigration Status

Apr 28, 2025 WASHINGTON — Steering committee members from the Education for All Campaign issued the following statements celebrating the defeat of extreme legislation that would have deprived students of their constitutional right to a public K-12...

NILC Statement on Effort to Strip Education from Tennessee Kids Based on Immigration Status

NILC Statement on Effort to Strip Education from Tennessee Kids Based on Immigration Status

Apr 10, 2025 WASHINGTON — Kica Matos, president of the National Immigration Law Center, issued the following statement after the Tennessee Senate voted to pass a bill (SB0836) that would allow school districts to deny access to education to kids based on...

Understanding Plyler v. Doe: SCOTUS Case Protecting Access to Public Education

Understanding Plyler v. Doe: SCOTUS Case Protecting Access to Public Education

Mar 20, 2025 The 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case Plyler v. Doe established that denying undocumented children access to free public K-12 education violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Read our explanation about this landmark...