FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Oct. 3, 2016
CONTACT
Juan Gastelum, [email protected], 213-375-3149
NILC Decries Justice Denied to Millions of Immigrant Families
LOS ANGELES — The U.S. Supreme Court today declined to rehear arguments in United States v. Texas, denying millions of immigrant families who would benefit from the Obama administration’s 2014 immigration executive actions their fair day before a full court.
The decision to forego a rehearing comes after an eight-justice Court failed to reach a majority in the case last session, letting a lower court ruling stand that blocked the implementation of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and the expansion of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). The two initiatives would have allowed eligible undocumented immigrants to remain with their families and work in the U.S. temporarily without fear of deportation.
The Justice Department filed a petition for a rehearing in July, asking to reargue the case before a full bench once a ninth justice is confirmed.
Marielena Hincapié, executive director at the National Immigration Law Center, issued the following statement:
“Once again, the Judiciary has allowed the politics of obstruction to prevail over justice. Legal experts across the board agree that a rehearing was not only appropriate, but necessary, in U.S. v. Texas. And yet, the Justices failed to do what’s best for the country by allowing this case to be reconsidered once the Supreme Court is fully staffed.
“The issues in U.S. v. Texas are too big for our country to accept a decision by default by the nation’s highest court. DAPA and the expansion of DACA would provide much needed relief to millions of families who live in constant fear of being separated from their loved ones. Furthermore, the two initiatives would reap sizable economic and public safety gains for our country.
“The fact that the Supreme Court has continued to fail to act on the nation’s most pressing issues only serves to remind us that we need a fully functional court today, not next year. We call upon the Senate to do its job and provide that ninth justice without delay. Today’s decision raises the stakes for the November elections even more. Voters must turn out to ensure that we elect a president who will shape the future of the country – not just for the next four years but for decades – as she or he will get to nominate several Supreme Court justices. ”
###
Worksite Raids Resistance & Response – TIRRC & NILC Webinar Training Series
Feb 12, 2025 This webinar series provides a comprehensive guide to responding to workplace raids, covering strategies for immediate crisis response, legal defense, media engagement, labor and civil rights violations, and organizational...
FAQ: Non-citizen Registration Requirement in Trump Day 1 Executive Order
Feb 6, 2025 This FAQ explains the law and history of immigrant registration in the U.S. and explores what the current Executive Order provision might mean for immigrant communities.
Conozca sus derechos bajo la Constitución de EE. UU., sea quien sea el presidente
Jan 31, 2025 Sin importar quien es presidente, todas las personas que viven en EE.UU. tienen ciertos derechos básicos bajo la constitución del país. Publicado originalmente en noviembre de...
Know Your Rights: What to Do if You Are Arrested or Detained by Immigration
Jan 31, 2025 This Know Your Rights resource provides general information on what to do if you are stopped, arrested, or detained by immigration or other law enforcement. Originally published in December...