Federal Court Blocks Trump Muslim and Refugee Ban

Mar 15, 2017

Border & Asylum Enforcement Racial Justice

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 15, 2017

CONTACT
Juan Gastelum, [email protected], 213-375-3149

Federal Court Blocks Trump Muslim and Refugee Ban

WASHINGTON — A federal court in Hawaii today blocked key parts of President Donald Trump’s revised executive order barring entry to the U.S. from six Muslim-majority countries and suspending refugee resettlement. The court found that the Muslim and refugee bans were likely to be unconstitutional, and ordered that the federal government not reduce refugee admissions from 110,000 to 50,000. The court’s temporary restraining order is in place nationwide.

The decision comes just hours before the revised executive order, signed by Trump on March 6, was scheduled to take effect.

Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center, issued the following statement:

“Trump’s discriminatory Muslim and refugee ban, in any iteration, is a clear example of how this administration uses the politics of fear and hate to enact its xenophobic agenda. The courts—and the country—saw through this effort, which has been roundly rejected over and over. It’s clear that no amount of tweaking will undo the discriminatory intent behind this policy. Today’s decision is a victory for the rule of law and reminder that no one—not even the president—is above the Constitution.”

In a separate case, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), with our partners at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of Maryland, sued on behalf of the International Refugee Assistance Project of the Urban Justice Center, HIAS, and the Middle East Studies Association, along with individuals, including U.S. citizens, affected by the ban. A federal judge in Maryland is expected to issue a ruling in that case later today.

The temporary restraining order can be viewed here: www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/HI-TRO.pdf.

# # #

Related
CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Sep 11, 2026

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Sep 2, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Alerta Comunitaria: Viajar con un “permiso adelantado” conlleva ahora vetos de 3 y 10 años

Published Sep 2, 2026 El 13 de agosto de 2026, el tribunal de apelaciones de los Estados Unidos (la Junta de Apelaciones de Inmigración, o “BIA” por sus siglas en inglés) cambió las consecuencias de viajar con un “permiso adelantado.” Lee este recurso...

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Amid Reports of Mass Visa ‘Pause,’ Groups File Emergency Motion to Enforce Court Order Striking Down 75-Country Visa Ban

Published Aug 26, 2026 Immigrant families, workers, and legal assistance groups harmed by the Trump administration’s 75-country ban on immigrant visas filed an emergency motion to enforce Friday’s court order and judgment in CLINIC v....