Zelaya v. Hammer

Last update: Aug 29, 2024 Filing Location: U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee

Class action lawsuit on behalf of nearly 100 Latinx workers at a meat processing plant in East Tennessee, seeking relief after their rights were violated in a massive workplace immigration raid in April 2018.

Case Overview

In April 2018, DHS and IRS raided the Southeastern Provision meatpacking plant in Bean Station, Tennessee in what was the largest workplace raid in nearly a decade.

The armed agents detained every worker who looked Latinx in the plant without regard to citizenship or documentation, a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Many workers weren’t even asked about documentation until hours into the raid. By then, many had already been traumatized, handcuffed, and denied communication with attorneys or family members — or access to sanitary facilities or critical medication — and taken to a holding facility.

In 2019, The National Immigration Law Center, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the law firm of Sherrard, Roe, Voigt & Harbison filed a lawsuit on behalf of seven workers who had been racially profiled and subjected to excessive force during the raid.

In August of 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify the class of approximately 100 workers. This was a precedent-setting decision which paved the way for class wide relief for the unlawful policing and racial profiling claims brought in the lawsuit.

In October 2022, a federal judge preliminarily approved, and in February 2023, the court formally approved a historic settlement agreement which provided over $1.175 million to the workers and required the United States to pay $475,000 to the six named plaintiffs to settle their claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including excessive force and unlawful arrest. The settlement is the largest and only known class settlement relating to an immigration raid and the first of its kind to provide avenues for immigration relief for plaintiffs in settlement.

"As the officers lined us up, I offered to show them my documentation to work in this country, but they handcuffed me anyway, detained me, and took me to the armory. I am part of this lawsuit because I want justice for myself and my coworkers who were denied our constitutional rights, as well as our humanity.”
Isabel Zelaya

Plaintiff

The Latest
Documents Typically Used by Lawfully Present Immigrants (Table)

Documents Typically Used by Lawfully Present Immigrants (Table)

Oct 28, 2024 This table lists the categories of non–U.S. citizens who are recognized as “lawfully present” in the United States and the immigration documents such people typically have.

State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Texas and other states sued the federal government to stop the Keeping Families Together Parole in Place policy, which allows eligible noncitizens to apply for work authorization and adjustment of status in the U.S. without having to leave the...

Last update: Oct 31, 2024

Know Your Rights: Safety Tips for the Haitian Community

Know Your Rights: Safety Tips for the Haitian Community

Oct 17, 2024 This resource, created in partnership with Faith In Action, provides essential steps to help you safeguard yourself and your loved ones.

The Orantes Injunction: Protections for Detained Salvadorans After a Worksite Raid

The Orantes Injunction: Protections for Detained Salvadorans After a Worksite Raid

Sep 12, 2024 Information for attorneys and legal workers representing persons detained in immigration worksite raids (or in any enforcement action) about the Orantes' permanent injunction.