Closed

Zelaya v. Hammer

Last update: Aug 29, 2024 Filing Location: U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee

Class action lawsuit on behalf of nearly 100 Latinx workers at a meat processing plant in East Tennessee, seeking relief after their rights were violated in a massive workplace immigration raid in April 2018.

Case Overview

In April 2018, DHS and IRS raided the Southeastern Provision meatpacking plant in Bean Station, Tennessee in what was the largest workplace raid in nearly a decade.

The armed agents detained every worker who looked Latinx in the plant without regard to citizenship or documentation, a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Many workers weren’t even asked about documentation until hours into the raid. By then, many had already been traumatized, handcuffed, and denied communication with attorneys or family members — or access to sanitary facilities or critical medication — and taken to a holding facility.

In 2019, The National Immigration Law Center, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the law firm of Sherrard, Roe, Voigt & Harbison filed a lawsuit on behalf of seven workers who had been racially profiled and subjected to excessive force during the raid.

In August of 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify the class of approximately 100 workers. This was a precedent-setting decision which paved the way for class wide relief for the unlawful policing and racial profiling claims brought in the lawsuit.

In October 2022, a federal judge preliminarily approved, and in February 2023, the court formally approved a historic settlement agreement which provided over $1.175 million to the workers and required the United States to pay $475,000 to the six named plaintiffs to settle their claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including excessive force and unlawful arrest. The settlement is the largest and only known class settlement relating to an immigration raid and the first of its kind to provide avenues for immigration relief for plaintiffs in settlement.

"As the officers lined us up, I offered to show them my documentation to work in this country, but they handcuffed me anyway, detained me, and took me to the armory. I am part of this lawsuit because I want justice for myself and my coworkers who were denied our constitutional rights, as well as our humanity.”
Isabel Zelaya

Plaintiff

Related
resource

Know Your Rights: Pregnant, Postpartum, and Nursing People Facing Immigration Enforcement 

Published Nov 4, 2026 DHS is detaining pregnant and postpartum people. This resource explains how to advocate for yourself or a loved one who is facing detention or deportation.

resource

Sample Request to Remove Electronic Monitoring

Published Nov 4, 2026 DHS is forcing pregnant people to wear electronic monitors. This sample can be used to write to your immigration officer and ask that they take off the monitor

litigation

Greater Boston Legal Services et al. v. Mullin

This lawsuit challenges the federal government’s new policy of hiding the locations of thousands of people detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The policy unlawfully interferes with communication between detainees, their...

Last update: Nov 4, 2026

litigation

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Nov 3, 2026