Active

The Door v. Edlow

Filing Location: U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Southern Division

This lawsuit challenges the government’s broad attempts to rush the deportation of unaccompanied children in violation of their civil rights and U.S. law.

Case Number: 8:26-cv-04326-DLB
Featured Downloads

Case Overview

This lawsuit challenges the government’s broad attempts to rush the deportation of unaccompanied children in violation of their civil rights and child protection laws passed by Congress. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, argues multiple federal agencies are illegally dismantling the rights of unaccompanied immigrant children seeking safety and denying them a fair chance to request protection in the United States.

The plaintiffs in the case include the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights (Amica Center), The Door, The Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project (FIRRP), Galveston-Houston Immigrant Representation Project (GHIRP), Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef), and Jewish Family and Community Services (JFCS) Pittsburgh. The plaintiffs are represented by the National Immigration Law Center, Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, the National Center for Youth Law, and Trial Impact Project.

Nearly 20 years ago, Congress passed bipartisan legislation designed to ensure that vulnerable immigrant children could seek refuge and safety in the U.S. Now, these same children are rushed through immigration proceedings in ways that plainly deny them their constitutional right to due process and put them in danger. The complaint argues that multiple government agencies responsible for protecting children and ensuring fair access to legal proceedings have been systematically dismantling their procedural and substantive rights. These actions have included requiring children to file asylum applications within weeks after arriving in the U.S.; giving children extremely short notice —sometimes less than even 24 hours — of their asylum interview, thereby denying them any reasonable opportunity to prepare or submit evidence in support of their claims; abruptly changing the interview venue and format with little warning; mandating the children appear in court multiple times per month; and instructing immigration judges to “complete” their detained immigrant children dockets by January 31, 2027.

Multiple federal agencies are colluding to put vulnerable children on what amounts to a deportation assembly line.
Lynn Damiano Pearson

Director of Legal Strategy, NILC

Related
press release

Advocates for Unaccompanied Children File Lawsuit to Stop Federal Government’s Fast-Track Deportation Scheme

Published Oct 15, 2026 Legal service providers representing immigrant children filed a challenge in federal court today to stop the cruel and unlawful scheme to fast-track children’s asylum cases.

resource

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Oct 6, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

litigation

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Oct 1, 2026

resource

CLINIC v. Rubio: The 75-Country Visa Pause Was Vacated. What Happens Now?

Published Sep 30, 2026 A practical roadmap, created by CLINIC, for immigrant visa applicants and their legal representatives.