Case Overview
In 2019, the National Immigration Law Center and co-counsel filed the first federal lawsuit challenging the legality of three interrelated “public charge” rules set forth by the Trump administration. These rules sought to transform the United States’ longstanding family-based immigration system into a system that favored the wealthy and discriminated against people of color.
The “public charge” inadmissibility test has been part of federal immigration law for over 140 years. It seeks to identify people who will depend on the U.S. government as their main source of support in the future. If an immigration or consular official determines that someone is likely to become a “public charge,” the government can deny that person’s application for admission to the United States or an application for lawful permanent resident status (LPR status, also called a “green card”).
Beginning in 2018, the Department of State under the Trump administration began issuing rules that radically expanded the definition of “public charge” from someone who is predominantly reliant on government aid for subsistence to anyone who may access federal aid, in any amount, at any time in the future, even if they had become a U.S. citizen. The rules also included a presidential proclamation that would require immigrants to demonstrate the ability to obtain certain types of private health insurance within 30 days of arrival.
On July 29, 2020, the district court issued a preliminary injunction against all three rules. After the Biden Administration took office, the administration announced that it would rescind the presidential proclamation and take administrative action to reverse the other two rules.
The Biden Administration public charge regulations went into effect on December 23, 2022. The Biden Administration rescinded the Trump Administration’s presidential proclamation and largely reinstated the policies that existed prior to the Trump administration. The public charge regulations issued by the Biden Administration also included important clarifications about issues such as which immigrants are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, and under which circumstances the receipt of public benefits will or will not be considered in a public charge determination.
Legal Documents
-
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Memorandum Decision and Order – July 29, 2020
- Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss – February 27, 2020
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order – February 19, 2020
- Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Support of Motion to Dismiss – February 13, 2020
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction – January 21, 2020
Health Insurance Enrollment for DACA Recipients is Here!
Nov 1, 2024 In May 2024, the Biden-Harris administration made the major announcement that DACA recipients...
Major Benefit Programs Available to Immigrants in California (Table)
Nov 1, 2024 This table lists the programs for which certain immigrants residing in California are eligible. Originally published in May 2017.
Advocates Launch Awareness Campaign to Get Thousands of DACA Recipients Enrolled in ACA Health Coverage
Oct 30, 2024 The National Immigration Law Center (NILC), United We Dream (UWD), and Young Invincibles launched an online campaign to reach thousands of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients who will soon be eligible to purchase health...
Frequently Asked Questions: Affordable Care Act Eligibility for DACA Recipients
Oct 28, 2024 DACA Recipients will soon be able to access health coverage through the Affordable Care Act. The National Immigration Law Center answers the most frequently asked questions.
Joanna E. Cuevas Ingram
NILC Staff Attorney