Doe v. Mayorkas

Last update: Aug 29, 2024 Filing Location: U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Class action lawsuit challenging the deplorable conditions in U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) holding cells in the Tucson sector, the second largest CBP sector on the southern border.

Case Number: CV-15-00250-TUC-DCB

Status: In 2020, the court issued a permanent injunction, barring CBP from holding individuals for more than 48 hours without providing conditions to meet detainees’ basic human needs, including access to a bed and blanket, showers, adequate food and water, and medical assessments by a medical professional.


Case Overview

In June 2015, the National Immigration Law Center, along with co-counsel, filed a class action lawsuit challenging CBP’s practices of subjecting adults and children to deplorable conditions within its Tucson Sector facilities.

The Tucson Sector is the second largest CBP sector on the southern border. CBP regularly detains people in what are supposed to be short-term detention facilities for longer than the 12 hours for which the cells were designed.

CBP held our plaintiffs in overcrowded cells set to unacceptably cold temperatures without blankets or mattresses, access to potable water or adequate nutrition, adequate hygiene and sanitation, and medical screenings.

In November 2016, we obtained a preliminary injunction, requiring minimum standards to be met for people detained in the Tucson Sector facilities for more than 48 hours.

In 2020, we went to trial and ultimately secured a victory in the case, with the court finding that the conditions in CBP holding cells were punitive and in violation of the U.S. Constitution. The court issued a permanent injunction, ordering CBP to follow the standards set out in the preliminary injunction going forward. The permanent injunction bars CBP from holding individuals for more than 48 hours unless CBP provides conditions of confinement to meet Detainees’ basic human needs, including access to a bed and blanket, showers, adequate food and water, and medical assessments by a medical professional.

NILC continues to monitor conditions in the Tucson Sector facilities to ensure the government’s compliance with the court’s order.

This case is fundamentally about how we, as a country, treat people and what consequences that treatment has in their lives. We stand firmly in our belief that all people should be treated humanely and with dignity, and not detained in conditions that put their health and safety at risk.
Alvaro Huerta

Former NILC staff attorney

Related
Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Oct 6, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Oct 1, 2026

CLINIC v. Rubio: The 75-Country Visa Pause Was Vacated. What Happens Now?

CLINIC v. Rubio: The 75-Country Visa Pause Was Vacated. What Happens Now?

Published Sep 30, 2026 A practical roadmap, created by CLINIC, for immigrant visa applicants and their legal representatives.

LGML v. Noem

LGML v. Noem

This lawsuit seeks to stop the Trump administration from unlawfully expelling hundreds of unaccompanied Guatemalan children from the United States.

Last update: Sep 21, 2026