Sen. Sessions Scorns Principles and Laws He Would Be Charged with Enforcing as Attorney General

Jan 10, 2017

When President-elect Donald Trump nominated Sen. Jeff Sessions to oversee the Department of Justice, he took a major first step toward making good on his promise that his administration will target communities of color for criminalization and disenfranchisement.

Today the Senate Judiciary Committee will seek to determine whether Sessions is fit to serve as our nation’s next attorney general, but the senator’s record speaks for itself. His disdain for the very principles America was founded on is well documented. He has consistently demonstrated contempt for the diversity that makes America great. He has faithfully assaulted fundamental notions of fairness and equality under the law in both the courtroom and the Senate.

Throughout his career, Sessions has abused his power and used his position to manipulate the law and further a nativist agenda, directly targeting communities of color. As a senator, Sessions has repeatedly opposed legislation that would make our nation more equal and more just, including many policies that as attorney general he would be responsible for enforcing.

He has voted against proposed protections for some of our nation’s most vulnerable groups, including the Shepard-Byrd Hate Crime Act, which extended federal hate-crime protections to women, LGBT people, and people with disabilities—hate-crime protections that the Department of Justice now enforces.

He has consistently blocked legislation that would acknowledge and affirm the many benefits immigrants bring to our country. He strongly opposed allowing undocumented immigrants to apply for temporary work authorization and voted against the DREAM Act, which would have provided a way for immigrants who came to the United States as children to earn their citizenship. He also voted against the Senate’s recent bipartisan immigration reform bill, which would have given more protections to undocumented individuals already living in the country, most of whom have lived in our communities for over a decade.

The Justice Department has the responsibility to vigorously and vigilantly protect the rights and liberties of all Americans. But how can a man who has said that the NAACP and the ACLU were “communist-inspired” and “un-American” organizations “because they forced civil rights down the throats of people” lead the agency charged with upholding the very rights he has so consistently denigrated?

At a time when racial tensions are high, hate crimes are on the rise, and white supremacists feel emboldened by the election of Donald Trump, the country cannot afford to have an attorney general who has made a career of systematically marginalizing and disenfranchising African Americans, Muslims, immigrants, gays and lesbians, and women. He is simply the wrong choice.

Today the Senate Judiciary Committee must be resolute in holding Sessions accountable for statements he’s made and actions he’s taken that are indisputably discriminatory and racist. The committee must remember that it represents the interests and wellbeing of all Americans, including those caught in the crosshairs of the incoming administration.

Related
FAQ: The Federal Government Wants to Deny Refundable Tax Credits to Many Immigrants

FAQ: The Federal Government Wants to Deny Refundable Tax Credits to Many Immigrants

Updated Sep 11, 2026 The U.S. Treasury and IRS have proposed a new rule to radically change who can receive vital tax credits, excluding many immigrants who currently work, pay taxes, and meet existing eligibility requirements. This resource answers questions about...

CLINIC v. Rubio

CLINIC v. Rubio

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.

Last update: Sep 11, 2026

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California

Updated Sep 2, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...

Public Charge Applicability Table for Advocates

Public Charge Applicability Table for Advocates

Published Sep 2, 2026 This resource is designed to help advocates quickly identify whether public charge inadmissibility applies to an individual