President-elect Donald Trump may not have put any official policies in place yet, but his first steps as our nation’s next leader should send chills down the spine of anyone who believes in justice and equality.
Over the past few weeks, the incoming administration has announced its nominees to head the Departments of Justice, Education, and Health and Human Services, and it has named some of the people who will help guide strategy within the White House. These individuals will be primarily responsible for shaping our nation’s priorities over the next four years. But the personal history that each of these appointees brings to their job makes it highly doubtful that all of us living here in the U.S., regardless of where we were born, will be treated equally under the incoming administration.
Take, for example, Sen. Jeff Sessions, the nominee for attorney general (who heads the Dept. of Justice). Sessions has gone through a Senate confirmation process before—and he failed it. In June 1986, the Senate Judiciary Committee, whose majority was Republican, voted to reject his nomination by Ronald Reagan to be a federal district judge in Alabama. It was Sessions’ history of making racist remarks that sank his nomination.
Sessions has not done anything in the intervening years to lead anyone to believe that he has changed his perspective or rhetoric. In 2006, he argued that Dominican immigrants have almost nothing to contribute to the United States. In 2011, he dismissed the humanitarian crisis created by Alabama’s anti-immigrant law as simply an “unpleasant consequence” of the law.
The attorney general, our nation’s chief law enforcement officer, is charged with protecting the constitutional rights of all people, regardless of what they look like, how they identify, where they were born, or how much money they have. Sessions has proven time and time again that he does not have the character or judgment necessary to ensure that justice is truly applied equally.
The Senate has an important role to play in ensuring that those appointed to lead the nation are capable of doing so. Our senators are charged with carefully examining the record of each person nominated by President-elect Trump and determining whether they are capable of carrying out the responsibilities of the roles for which they’ve been selected.
Sessions clearly is not an appropriate choice to head the Justice Dept. The Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee did the right thing 30 years ago by refusing even to send his nomination for a federal judgeship to the Senate floor, thus killing it. Our tolerance for hateful rhetoric and divisive speech should not be higher today than it was then.
FAQ: The Federal Government Wants to Deny Refundable Tax Credits to Many Immigrants
Updated Sep 11, 2026 The U.S. Treasury and IRS have proposed a new rule to radically change who can receive vital tax credits, excluding many immigrants who currently work, pay taxes, and meet existing eligibility requirements. This resource answers questions about...
CLINIC v. Rubio
This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s sweeping suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries.
Last update: Sep 11, 2026
Benefits for Immigrant Survivors of Trafficking, Domestic Violence, and Other Serious Crimes in California
Updated Sep 2, 2026 This resource reviews the two categories of immigrants covered by California's SB 1569 (trafficking survivors and U visa applicants/holders), the benefits they may receive, and what they need to show in order to get these benefits. Originally...
Public Charge Applicability Table for Advocates
Published Sep 2, 2026 This resource is designed to help advocates quickly identify whether public charge inadmissibility applies to an individual
A Deplorable Choice to Head the Justice Department
Dec 4, 2016