NILC Responds to Nomination to U.S. Supreme Court of Judge Brett Kavanaugh

Jul 9, 2018

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 9, 2018

CONTACT
Email: [email protected]
Juan Gastelum, 213-375-3149

NILC Responds to Nomination to U.S. Supreme Court of Judge Brett Kavanaugh

LOS ANGELES — President Donald Trump today announced the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. The announcement comes just over a week after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced that he would soon retire.

Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center, issued the following statement:

“The Supreme Court is essential to maintaining the strength and integrity of our democracy. Its role in upholding the rights and values that we, as a nation, cherish most cannot be overstated.

“Judge Kavanaugh’s record makes it clear that he cannot be entrusted to uphold the awesome responsibility to be independent, open-minded, and to fairly weigh critical legal questions that have broad and significant impact on the lives of all who call the United States home. Kavanaugh’s legal writings and recent dissents speak for themselves: he thinks immigrant communities should be Constitution-free zones, and that reproductive justice should be curtailed.

“Especially at a time when the president and his administration have so freely traversed the boundaries of legality, the Senate has a responsibility to protect all its constituents. This includes the most marginalized, such as women, people of color, LGTBQI, workers, and the immigrant families, that live in their communities. If they do so, the majority of Senators should find that Judge Kavanaugh is unfit to serve in the highest court in the land.   

“The next Supreme Court justice must demonstrate a commitment to defend the rights of all people in the United States, as provided by the Constitution, and to serve as an independent check on the presidency regardless of who occupies the White House. Judge Kavanaugh cannot demonstrate such a commitment. The Senate has a responsibility to reject his nomination.”

###

Related
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al.

This lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s nationwide effort to use the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to intimidate eligible voters into foregoing participation in civic life, including voting, during the 2026 midterm...

Last update: Sep 18, 2026

Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locations

Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locations

Published Sep 18, 2026 Lawsuit argues that the federal government is intimidating voters and chilling civic participation, violating the Voting Rights Act.

How Anti-Black Racism Shapes Welfare Inequality for Immigrants

How Anti-Black Racism Shapes Welfare Inequality for Immigrants

Kat Lundie

Published Sep 18, 2026 Laws and policies throughout American history have consistently and systematically ensured that Black people and immigrants do not receive equal opportunities to escape poverty.

Public Charge: Frequently Asked Questions for Immigration Advocates

Public Charge: Frequently Asked Questions for Immigration Advocates

Published Sep 16, 2026 Starting September 18, 2026, a new regulation and new guidance on public charge inadmissibility will go into effect. This FAQ reflects our best understanding of the rule as of September 2026....