|
|
|
Immigrants’ Rights Update
Volume 21, Issue 5 |
June 21, 2007 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
|
|
New on
NILC’s Website (since May 10, 2007)
|
|
New on NILC’s Website (since
May 10, 2007) |
|
Featured Items |
|
|
■
NILC Annual Report for 2006
Summarizes succinctly major challenges low-income
immigrants and their advocates faced last year and continue to grapple with
so far in 2007. Among the topics covered: workplace raids, immigration
reform, state and local anti-immigrant initiatives, the Orantes
injunction (detention and due process issues), the impact of new citizenship
verification rules, and issues impacting immigrants that have arisen as a
result of Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath.
>>
www.nilc.org/nilcinfo/2006_nilc_annualreport.pdf
■
State and Local Policies on Immigrant Access to Services: Promoting
Integration or Isolation? (State-Funded Benefit Programs page).
Summarizes the proposals affecting access to health
care and other critical services for immigrants in 2006 and the first half
of 2007, including policies that deter eligible families from seeking
services, as well as affirmative efforts to promote immigrant integration
into our country’s communities.
>>
www.nilc.org/immspbs/sf_benefits/statelocalimmpolicies06-07_2007-05-24.pdf
|
|
Low-Income Immigrant Rights Conference |
|
|
■
6th National Low-Income Immigrant Rights
Conference: December 6-8, 2007 (6th National Conference: December 6-8, 2007
information page).
Who is expected to participate? 500 of the
leading advocates, organizers, and other experts from across the country
representing local, state, and national immigrant and refugee rights, civil
rights, health care, anti-poverty, legal, faith-based, ethnic, labor,
community, and low-wage worker groups.
>>
www.nilc.org/dc-conference2007.htm
|
|
Immigration Reform |
|
|
■
NILC Statement on the Thursday, June 7, Senate Vote: Not the End (Comprehensive Immigration Reform page).
“. . . In our view, the seeds of this setback were sown
when the compromise was first struck and the bill was laden with poisonous
provisions such as attacks on family immigration, a temporary worker program
that failed to meet the needs of workers or business, and punitive obstacles
to lawful status for undocumented immigrants. . . .”
>>
www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/CIR/cir025.htm |
|
|
■
Update on the Senate’s Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill: Interim Report (Comprehensive Immigration Reform page).
“On May 25, the Senate completed its first week of
debate on immigration reform, voting on 12 amendments to the ‘grand bargain’ that was negotiated by Senators Ted Kennedy
(D-MA) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ), the White House, and others, and then introduced
on the Senate floor. . . .”
>>
www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/CIR/cir024.htm |
|
|
■
NILC’s Statement on the Senate-White House Immigration Reform Proposal (Comprehensive Immigration Reform page).
“The National Immigration Law Center was one of the
first national organizations to support the legalization of undocumented
immigrants, and we have consistently encouraged and supported steps toward
the goal of comprehensive immigration reform. . . .
¶ That said, the deal that Senate negotiators have
consummated is a step in the wrong direction. . . .”
>>
www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/CIR/cir022.htm |
|
|
■
Senate Immigration Bill Proposes Unworkable Employment Eligibility
Verification System (Immigrant Worker Issues in Comprehensive
Immigration Reform page).
“The following issues reflect our top concerns with the
EEVS in the new Senate immigration reform bill. It is our hope that
these issues will be addressed through the amendment process . . . .”
>>
www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/cir/07senbill_titleIII_topconcerns_ 2007-05-21.pdf
|
|
Employment Issues |
|
|
■
H-2B
Guest Workers Win Landmark Decision in Suit against Luxury Hotel Chain (Resources for Hurricane Katrina Survivors page).
Guest workers expose hotelier’s scheme to profit from
immigrant labor while excluding African Americans.
>>
www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/LWIW/pressrelease-final.pdf (news
release)
>>
www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/LWIW/Castellanos_Decision.pdf
(decision)
■
Title
III of the STRIVE Act of 2007 (H.R. 1645): Employment Eligibility
Verification (Immigrant Worker Issues in Comprehensive
Immigration Reform page).
“The following summary is not a full analysis of Title
III. Rather, we hope to highlight the provisions in the STRIVE Act
that should be included in any EEVS proposal, and the provisions that should
be opposed.”
>>
www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/cir/strive_title3_highlights_2007-03-29.pdf
■
Facts
About Immigrant Workers (updated fact sheet on
Research on Immigrants and Employment page).
Headings: ¶ Foreign-born workers make up a
significant portion of the U.S. workforce.
¶ Immigrants are critical to the current and future
growth of the U.S. economy. ¶
But despite high participation in the workforce .
. . ¶ Low-wage immigrant workers are among the most
vulnerable to workplace exploitation, such as wage-and-hour and
health-and-safety violations.
>>
www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/resrch_emplymnt/factsaboutimmigrant
workers_2007-04.pdf
|
|
Public Benefits Issues |
|
|
■
Immigrant Children’s Health Improvement Act (ICHIA)-related items (Immigrant Children’s Health Improvement Act page).
¶ Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics
on State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) reauthorization,
calling for coverage of lawfully residing immigrant children and pregnant
women.
>>
www.nilc.org/immspbs/cdev/ICHIA/schip_reauth_AmAcad Pediatrics_2007-06.pdf
¶ Letter from the National Governors Association
to Senate Finance Committee leadership re: governors’ priorities for
2007 reauthorization of SCHIP, which includes covering lawfully residing
immigrant children and pregnant women, a long-standing NGA policy.
>>
[Link to letter on Nat’l Governors
Assoc. website.]
¶ Faith Community Supports ICHIA: The
heads of 20 national religious organizations representing 50 million
Americans joined with PICO National Network and the National Council of
Churches USA in asking Senate Finance Chair Baucus and Majority Leader Reid
to allow states to “cover pregnant women and legally documented immigrant
children” as part of the 2007 SCHIP reauthorization.
>>
[Link to letter on PICO Network
website.]
¶ Letter from California Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger to leadership of the Senate Finance Committee
supporting inclusion of ICHIA in SCHIP reauthorization.
>>
www.nilc.org/immspbs/cdev/ICHIA/schip_reauth_calgovletter_ 2007-06-05.pdf
¶ Letter from California Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger to leadership of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee supporting inclusion of ICHIA in SCHIP reauthorization.
>>
www.nilc.org/immspbs/cdev/ICHIA/schip_reauth_calgovletter
house_2007-06-05.pdf
¶ “Health Care Opinion Leaders’ Views on
Priorities for SCHIP Reauthorization,” by Katherine K. Shea, Karen
Davis, Anne Gauthier, Rachel Nuzum, Barry Scholl, and Edward L. Schor (The
Commonwealth Fund, Apr. 25, 2007).
>>
[Link to report on The Commonwealth Fund
website.]
¶ Immigrant Children’s Health Improvement Act
Fact Sheet (California Immigrant Policy Center, May 2007).
>>
[Link to fact sheet on CIPC website.]
■
Medicaid Citizenship Documentation (Verification & Reporting page).
Statutory changes suggested by the American Public
Human Services Association (APHSA) and the National Association of State
Medical Directors (NASMD) “to provide states with the flexibility that they
need to ensure that Medicaid services are provided to eligible individuals
through cost-efficient methods.”
>>
[Link to issue paper on NASMD website.]
■
Facts
About Immigrants and the Food Stamp Program (updated fact sheet on
Food and Nutrition Programs page).
Headings: ¶ Food stamps are available only
to U.S. citizens and limited categories of lawfully residing immigrants.
¶ Noncitizens work at the same rate as U.S. citizens but are twice as likely
to be poor, in part because they work predominantly in low-wage jobs.
¶ As a result, children in immigrant households suffer more from economic
hardship and food insecurity than other children. ¶ Yet immigrants are
far less likely to receive food stamps than citizens with similar incomes.
¶ Immigrants pay taxes, work hard, and make vital contributions to the U.
S.; they should not be subject to special restrictions on basic food
assistance. ¶ There is broad, bipartisan consensus that the Food Stamp
Program should serve both citizens and lawfully residing immigrants.
>>
www.nilc.org/immspbs/fnutr/foodasst/foodstampfacts_2007-05-30.pdf |
|
|
|
|