|
|
|
Immigrants' Rights Update
Volume 20, Issue 5
September 29, 2006 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
Facts about the Benefits of Immigration (Three Issue Briefs) |
|
|
Paying Their Way and Then Some:
Facts about the Contributions of Immigrants to Economic Growth and Public
Investment |
|
|
The Economic and Fiscal Effects
of the Senate's Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 |
|
|
Facts About Immigrants' Low Use
of Health Services and Public Benefits |
|
|
|
|
Issue Brief 1 |
|
|
Paying Their Way and Then Some: Facts about the
Contributions of Immigrants to Economic Growth and Public Investment |
|
|
Immigrants make a variety of
economic, social and cultural contributions to the United States. This fact
sheet details the economic contributions of immigrants. It finds that
immigrants are net contributors to the economy and the Treasury and play an
essential role in shoring up Social Security for future generations.
Expanding pathways to legal status for immigrants is a central element of
what has come to be known as "comprehensive immigration reform." One
example of a more comprehensive approach, the legislation passed by the
Senate (S 2611) would boost economic growth and improve the solvency of the
Social Security Trust Fund.
The economic and fiscal benefits of immigration should
not be the sole driver of immigration policy but are important to keep in
mind, particularly because "some of the fundamental economics of immigration
are too often obscured by misguided commentary."[1] A lack of understanding
about the economic and fiscal benefits of immigration has also led to
misguided public policies that discriminate against immigrants despite their
contributions. For example, federal policies adopted in 1996 deny
subsidized health insurance and other federal public benefits to many
immigrant workers, even though they pay federal and state taxes that fund
these benefits. [Read more.] |
|
|
|
|
Issue Brief 2 |
|
|
The Economic and Fiscal Effects of the Senate's Comprehensive
Immigration Reform Act of 2006
--By
Shawn Fremstad |
|
|
A majority of the U.S. House of
Representatives recently voted in favor of what the New York Times
characterized as "a pre-election lineup of narrow enforcement measures
packaged to give voters a false impression of resolve."[1] Meanwhile, House leadership
has eschewed meaningful reform of the nation’s broken legal immigration
system, seeming to reserve particular disdain for the creation of any path
to legal status for undocumented workers. Most Americans, however,
support providing new pathways to legal status for such workers.[2]
Expanding pathways to legal status for undocumented
immigrants has become a core element of what is known as "comprehensive
immigration reform." One example of a more comprehensive approach, the
legislation passed by the Senate earlier this year (S 2611), includes
enforcement provisions but would also reduce current family visa backlogs,
provide new visas for certain "guest workers," and allow some currently
undocumented people to obtain legal status after paying fines and passing
criminal background checks.
This report draws on government data and estimates to
analyze the economic and fiscal effects of proposals to provide new pathways
to legal status. Estimates produced by the nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) show that the provisions of the Senate bill that create
new pathways to legal immigration would result in increased federal tax
revenues and economic growth. Based on an analysis of the CBO data, a
reasonable middle-ground estimate is that the Senate bill would increase the
nation's gross domestic product (GDP) by around $36 billion a year over the
next five years and by $134 billion a year in 2012-2016. The actual
benefits could be somewhat higher or lower, but there is little question
that there would be net economic benefits.
[Read more.] |
|
|
|
|
Issue Brief 3 |
|
|
Facts About Immigrants' Low Use of Health Services and Public
Benefits |
|
|
Low-income immigrants are less likely to receive means-tested public
benefits than are low-income
U.S. citizens. Immigrants' low use of
public benefits is not due solely to restrictions placed on their
eligibility for various programs. Even immigrants who are eligible are
less likely to receive benefits than U.S. citizens. This issue brief
examines immigrants' use of health services and public benefits, and reviews
some of the reasons why immigrants should be granted the same access to
public benefits as U.S. citizens.
[Read more.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|