IMMIGRANTS & PUBLIC BENEFITS

Language Access

 

 

RAMIREZ V. GIULIANI:  N.Y. CITY’S FAILURE TO PROVIDE INTERPRETERS FOR FOOD STAMP APPLICANTS AND RECIPIENTS CHALLENGED
Immigrants’ Rights Update, Vol. 13, No. 8, December 28, 1999

A class action lawsuit was recently filed in federal court against New York City and state defendants challenging the city’s failure to provide interpreter services or translate food stamp materials into appropriate languages for non-English speaking food stamp applicants and recipients.

The plaintiffs assert claims under the Food Stamp Act and its implementing regulations, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the U.S. Constitution, and New York state law protecting against discrimination.  The plaintiffs seek to compel New York City to provide food stamp material for non-English speaking clients, provide interpreter services, and refrain from informing clients that interpreter services are not available or that they should obtain their own interpreter.  Plaintiffs also seek an order requiring the state of New York to oversee and supervise the city’s administration of the program so that non-English speaking individuals are assured access.

The plaintiffs have moved for a temporary restraining order (TRO), preliminary injunctive relief, and class certification.  Discovery is proceeding and depositions are ongoing.  The court has ordered New York City to submit a proposal of preliminary remedy by Jan. 18, 2000.

Ramirez v. Giuliani, 99 Civ. __, (S.D.N.Y. filed Aug. 27, 1999) (Complaint).

 

Home | What's New | About NILC | Publications | Community Education Materials
Immigrants & Employment | Immigrants & Public Benefits | Immigration Law & Policy
Trainings | Links
California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative