
IMMIGRANTS
& PUBLIC BENEFITS |
PRESIDENTS 2001 BUDGET WOULD RESTORE MORE
BENEFITS TO IMMIGRANTS
Immigrants Rights Update, Vol. 14, No. 1, February 11, 2000
The Clinton administrations final budget proposal, released on Feb. 7, 2000, includes provisions that would undo many of the restrictions on immigrants access to health, disability, and nutrition programs imposed by the 1996 immigration and welfare reform laws. The proposed immigrant eligibility restorations are broader than those contained in last years budget proposal, all of which were ultimately rejected by Congress.
In all, this years changes would cost the federal government $2.5 billion over five years, compared with the $1.3 billion that last years proposals would have cost had they become law. However, the restorations contained in the administrations budget are not as extensive as those proposed by some congressional measures introduced during the last legislative season (these bills remain under consideration and can become law this year).
This years budget submission would make the following restorations and additions:
Health care for children and pregnant women. Under current law, states are barred from using federal funds to provide Medicaid or State Child Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) benefits to most categories of immigrants who (1) entered the U.S. after Aug. 22, 1996 (the date on which the 1996 welfare bill was enacted) and (2) have been here less than five years. The administrations budget proposal would give states the option to cover lawfully present pregnant women under Medicaid and lawfully present children under Medicaid and SCHIP, regardless of their date of entry. Administration officials estimate that allowing states this option would cost the federal government $695 million over five years and provide federal health insurance to about 144,000 children and 33,000 pregnant women by FY 2005. States that already use their own funds to provide assistance to these women and children would have state money freed up to provide health insurance to other groups of immigrants they do not presently cover.
This proposal is also contained in the much broader Fairness for Legal Immigrants Act (S.792, H.R.1399) proposed last year by Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) and Representative Sander Levin (D-MI) (see "'Fairness for Legal Immigrants' Bill Introduced with Bipartisan Support," Immigrants Rights Update, Apr. 30, 1999, p. 11). The Fairness for Legal Immigrants Act now has 16 Senate cosponsors and 83 House cosponsors. In addition, the provisions of the Fairness for Legal Immigrants Act restoring federal SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility to children and pregnant women are embodied in the Immigrant Childrens Health Improvement Act (S.1227), which was authored by the late Senator John Chafee (R-RI). This bill enjoys solid bipartisan support (see "Bipartisan Legislation Introduced on Immigrant Childrens Health Care," Immigrants Rights Update, June 30, 1999, p. 11).
Food stamps. Under current law, there are more restrictions on immigrants access to food stamps than on any other public benefit. Hundreds of thousands of lawfully present immigrants remain ineligible, including many who have been in the U.S. for several decades. This years budget proposal would restore food stamps to 210,000 "qualified" immigrants by FY 2003far more than last years administration proposalat a cost of $565 million over five years. Specifically, the proposal would allow the following two groups of immigrants who were lawfully present in the U.S. before Aug. 22, 1996, to obtain food stamps:
Parents of eligible children. Currently, children who were lawfully in the U.S. on Aug. 22, 1996, qualify, but their parents do not. As a result, these children do not benefit fully from their allotment because the household food stamp grant does not take into account their parents needs. The entire family must make do with an allotment intended only for the children. The administration proposal would ensure that food stamp grants account for all qualified family members who entered before the welfare bill passed.
Elderly immigrants who turned 65 since Aug. 22, 1996. Currently, immigrants are eligible if they were lawfully present and older than 65 years of age when the welfare bill passed. The administration proposal would allow the elderly to "age-in" to eligibility once they turn 65, without regard to how old they were when the welfare bill was passed.
Although it would restore food stamps coverage to hundreds of thousands of immigrants, the administrations proposal is not as comprehensive as the Fairness for Legal Immigrants Act, which would restore food stamp eligibility to all qualified immigrants who came to the U.S. before the welfare bill passed. Nor does the proposal match the Hunger Relief Act (S.1305, H.R.3192), which would restore coverage to all qualified immigrants regardless of their date of entry into the U.S. The Hunger Relief Act includes a number of other improvements in nutrition programs, and it enjoys bipartisan support in both the House and Senate (see "Coalition Urges Passage of Hunger Relief Act of 1999" Immigrants Rights Update, Dec. 28, 1999, p. 8).
Disability and health. Under current law, most immigrants who entered the U.S. after Aug. 22, 1996, are ineligible for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and, in many cases, also for Medicaid. The budget proposal would permit qualified immigrants who entered after the welfare bills enactment and who become disabled after arriving in the U.S. to receive SSI (and associated Medicaid) once they have lived here for at least five years. The administration estimates that this proposal would help 53,000 disabled immigrants by 2005, at a five-year cost of $1.2 billion.
This proposal is similar to one of the provisions of the Hunger Relief Act, but the Hunger Relief Act would not impose a five-year waiting period.
Immigrant eligibility for SCHIP expansion. The administration this year is proposing a $75 billion dollar expansion of the SCHIP program to give states the option to cover the parents of children who are eligible for SCHIP. This initiative, known as FamilyCare, would significantly expand health insurance coverage for low-income families generally and not only for immigrants. An important element of the FamilyCare program is that it would cover immigrants regardless of their date of entry into the U.S.
English language instruction. Finally, the proposed budget includes $75 million for FY 2001 to help an estimated 250,000 individuals learn English under the English Language/Civics Initiative. This amount would constitute an increase of $50 million over the current years spending on this important initiative, which helps states and communities provide access to English-language instruction linked to civics and life skills instruction.
![]()
Home
| What's New | About
NILC | Publications | Community Education Materials
Immigrants & Employment | Immigrants & Public Benefits | Immigration Law & Policy
Trainings | Links
California
Immigrant Welfare Collaborative