
IMMIGRANTS
& EMPLOYMENT |
SUPREME COURT DENIES CERTIORARI IN WALTERS V. RENO; NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION OF
DOCUMENT FRAUD NOTICE FORMS AND PROCEDURES UPHELD
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Walters v. Reno, leaving intact the Ninth Circuits nationwide injunction against Immigration and Naturalization Service civil document fraud procedures (for more detail on this case, see "Ninth Circuit Upholds Nationwide Injunction of INS Civil Document Fraud Notice Forms and Procedures," Immigrants Rights Update, Jun. 17, 1998, p. 9).
The class action lawsuit challenged the INSs implementation of section 274C of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which makes it unlawful to knowingly engage in certain types of immigration-related document fraud. Before the injunction, the INS had been notifying individuals charged with civil document fraud by using forms that failed both to describe the nature of the charge and to make clear that, in order to protect their right to seek relief from deportation, respondents must make two separate requests for hearings. In addition, with the exception of some INS districts that on their own initiative made Spanish translations, the INS had been using forms written only in English.
Both the district court and the Ninth Circuit determined that the INSs 274C notice forms and procedures violated due process. The Ninth Circuits opinion upheld the district courts injunction in all respects save one: instead of requiring the INS to develop new forms in English and Spanish, the decision left it to the agencys discretion in the first instance to develop an appropriate notice.
Walters v. Reno, 145 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 1998); cert. denied, Reno v. Walters, __ U.S. __, No. 98-730 (Mar. 8, 1999).
![]()
Home
| What's New | About
NILC | Publications | Community
Education Materials
Immigrants & Employment | Immigrants
& Public Benefits | Immigration
Law & Policy
Trainings | Links
California
Immigrant Welfare Collaborative