IMMIGRATION LAW & POLICY

Local Law Enforcement Issues

Immigration

Employment Issues

Public Benefits

Driver's Licenses

DREAM Act

Search

 

Bill authorizing enforcement of immigration law by state and local authorities introduced in Senate

Immigrants' Rights Update, Vol. 19, Issue 8, December 22, 2005


     A bill that would authorize state and local authorities to enforce immigration law and impose civil and criminal penalties under state and local laws for immigration violations has been offered in the Senate.  Introduced on Oct. 5, 2005, by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), the Illegal Immigration Enforcement and Empowerment Act (S. 1823) would also authorize the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) to establish a volunteer "border marshal" program made up of trained police and peace officers.  Despite its intent to establish explicit federal statutory authority for states and localities to engage in immigration law enforcement, the bill leaves many key questions unanswered.

     This legislation would give a state or unit of local government the option to "investigate, identify, apprehend, arrest, detain, prosecute, and impose criminal or civil penalties" on individuals who violate federal immigration law or state laws based on federal immigration law.  The bill would place restrictions on the penalties that could be imposed and require that the federal government identify an individual as having violated immigration law before the state or local government unit could impose a penalty. 

     Authorizing a state to prosecute and impose criminal or civil penalties goes well beyond the Homeland Security Enhancement Act of 2005 (HSEA, S. 1362), which purports to recognize the "existing inherent authority of States, law enforcement personnel of a State or a political subdivision of a State . . . to investigate, identify, apprehend, arrest, detain or transfer to Federal custody aliens in the United States."  Under the HSEA, the federal government retains its exclusive authority to prosecute and impose criminal or civil penalties for violations of immigration law.  The Hutchison bill does not explain how state authorities would prosecute civil violations of federal immigration law, which take place under procedures and rules specified in the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

     The bill also would authorize states to create their own regulations to enforce federal immigration law, so that states would be able to dictate how federal laws are enforced.  For example, a sheriff in New Hampshire recently attempted to prosecute undocumented immigrants for criminal trespassing.  A state court dismissed the trespassing charge, ruling that immigration enforcement is the sole province of the federal government.  S. 1823 would authorize states to undertake such prosecutions. 

     The bill provides that no penalty may be imposed by a state for an immigration violation unless the individual has been "identified" by the federal government as having violated a federal immigration law.  But it does not require that such identifications be based on any administrative or judicial determination of an immigration violation having occurred.  Nor does the bill require local or state police personnel to be trained in immigration law enforcement.

     In addition, the legislation would give the secretary of DHS the option to create a pilot Volunteer Border Marshal Program to assist DHS in securing the border.  The volunteers would have to be "state-licensed peace officers," which are defined as any employed or retired law enforcement agent who is (or was) licensed to enforce state or local penal laws.  The bill merely requires that the peace officers be well trained before becoming border marshals, without describing in detail what type of training would be required.  Hutchison has called her proposal a direct response to the Minuteman Project, which consists of a group of private citizens who gained media attention for patrolling parts of the U.S.-Mexico border.  The group's original plan to act as a civilian border patrol for a month gained wide media attention, garnering the loose coalition national prominence.  

     Since that time, the activities of the Minuteman Project and similar anti-immigrant groups have grown.  Participants in U.S. suburbs, such as Herndon, VA, have been monitoring sites where day laborers gather in hopes of being hired by homeowners or contractors.  A Minuteman spin-off in Utah organized protests of banks that accept consular identification cards, ID cards issued by the consulates of Mexico and other countries to their citizens living in the U.S.  A related group in Colorado has protested the presence of Mexican comic books in a public library.  Some individuals are planning a citizen patrol of the Canadian border.  Minutemen Project participants have been involved in incidents in which day laborers were harassed, immigrant rights activists threatened, and border-crossers shot at.  Though Hutchison's bill aims to place border enforcement solely into the hands of police professionals, immigrant rights advocates are alarmed by its failure to require local and state police, volunteer or otherwise, to be trained in immigration enforcement.

By Jennifer Hojaiban, NILC research associate | hojaiban@nilc.org

 

 

Home | About NILC | Publications | Community Education Materials
Immigrants & Employment | Immigrants & Public Benefits | Immigration Law & Policy
Trainings | Links