|
|
|
Immigrants’ Rights Update
Volume 21, Issue 6 |
July 20, 2007 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
|
|
Detention Issues
|
|
Employment
Eligibility Verification Issues
|
|
Workers’
Rights
|
|
Supplemental Security Income
|
|
New on
NILC’s Website (since June 21, 2007)
-
Facts About
Federal Preemption: How to analyze whether
state and local initiatives are an unlawful attempt to enforce
federal immigration law or regulate immigration
-
Immigrant Eligibility for
Disaster Assistance: Fact sheet prepared by NILC, National
Council of La Raza, and the American Red Cross
-
6th National Low-Income
Immigrant Rights Conference: December 6-8, 2007
-
Senate Immigration Reform Bill:
NILC Statement on the Thursday, June 28, Cloture Vote
-
U.S. Immigration Detention
System: Substandard Conditions of Confinement and Ineffective
Oversight
-
Refugee Roulette: Disparities in
Asylum Adjudication
-
Testimony of DREAM Students
before the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees,
Border Security, and International Law, May 18, 2007
-
2005 American Community Survey
and Census Data on the Foreign Born by State
-
Immigration's Economic Impact
-
The Basic Pilot Program: Not a
Magic Bullet
-
Testimony of Tyler Moran before
the House Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee on Social
Security, Hearing on Employment Eligibility Verification Systems,
June 7, 2007
-
Employment Verification:
Challenges Exist in Implementing a Mandatory Electronic Verification
System
-
Overview of Immigrant
Eligibility for Federal Programs
-
Guide to Immigrant Eligibility
for Federal Programs:
3 updated tables
|
|
Detention Issues |
|
|
Immigration Detention Centers under the Microscope:
Recent Reports Reveal Widespread Violations of the National Detention
Standards |
|
|
By
Karen
Tumlin, NILC Skadden Fellow
Over the last several months, independent
reports have focused public attention on the substandard conditions
immigrants face while detained by U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement
(ICE). Although ICE has national detention standards outlining basic
requirements for immigration detention, they are not legally enforceable,
unlike the comparable rules for criminal detainees. As a result, over
230,000 immigrants who are detained each year may be unable to win
meritorious cases for relief from removal, such as asylum, because of the
tremendous obstacles posed by detention, including lack of access to phones,
counsel, and basic legal materials. Recent reports have highlighted
system-wide problems with detainees’ access to phones and medical treatment.
[Read more.]
|
|
Employment Eligibility Verification Issues |
|
|
New Arizona Law Requires Employers to Use Flawed Employment Eligibility
Verification Basic Pilot |
|
|
By
Tyler Moran, Employment Policy Director
The Legal Arizona Workers Act (HB 2779), which Gov. Janet
Napolitano signed into law on July 2, requires every employer in
Arizona to use the federal
Basic Pilot program to verify the employment eligibility of all
new hires and creates state penalties for employers who “knowingly”
or “intentionally” employ undocumented non–U.S. citizens. In a
letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the governor noted Congress’s failure to move
on comprehensive immigration reform and stated that “one of the
practical effects of this failure is that Arizona, and states across
the nation, must now address this escalating problem on their own.”
[Read more.]
|
|
|
ICE Conducted I-9 Audit to Help Employer Retaliate against Workers |
|
|
By
Monica
Guizar, Employment Policy Attorney
A U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) audit this past spring of an Emeryville, California, hotel
was initiated after the hotel’s management contacted the hotel owner’s
congressperson, who then wrote to the head of ICE asking that the agency
investigate the immigration status of hotel employees. For about a year,
workers at the Woodfin Suite Hotel had been organizing to enforce a local
living wage ordinance, and they had sued the hotel for failing to pay the
living wage. Hotel management had retaliated by requesting that the Social
Security Administration (SSA) verify whether the workers’ Social Security
numbers (SSNs) matched SSA’s records and firing those workers whose SSNs did
not match. The management also threatened to contact immigration
authorities.
[Read more.]
|
|
|
9th Circuit: Workers May Be Granted Unpaid Leave to Resolve Employment
Authorization Problems |
|
|
By
Monica
Guizar, Employment Policy Attorney
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that the
“employer sanctions” provision of federal immigration law (which was
added by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, or IRCA)
does not preempt California’s wrongful termination law, which
provides for remedies to workers who have been terminated in
violation of an express or implied contract that they will not be
discharged without good cause. Perhaps more importantly, the court
found that IRCA does not bar employers from granting workers unpaid
leave to resolve employment authorization problems.
[Read more.]
|
|
Workers’ Rights |
|
|
Employer That Knowingly Violated I-9 Requirement Ordered to Pay “Back Pay” |
|
|
By
Monica Guizar,
Employment Policy Attorney
(REVISED
June 12, 2008)
An administrative law judge (ALJ) in New York has ordered a
back pay award to seven workers who had been fired by their employer,
Mezonos Maven Bakery, for engaging in concerted activity by complaining
together about their supervisor’s behavior towards them. Some of the seven
workers had been employed by Mezonos for nearly 10 years. During this time,
the employer had not asked some of them to provide employment authorization
documents and had never completed I-9 employment eligibility verification
forms for any of them.
[Read
more.]
|
|
Supplemental Security Income |
|
|
House Passes Supplemental Security Income Extension for Humanitarian
Immigrants |
|
|
By
Tanya
Broder, Public Benefits Policy Director
The week of July 9, the U.S. House
of Representatives passed HR 2608, the SSI Extension for Elderly and
Disabled Refugees Act, on a voice vote. Representatives Jim McDermott
(D-WA), Jerry Weller (R-IL), Phil English (R-PA), Pete Stark (D-CA), and
Xavier Becerra (D-CA)
spoke
eloquently about the persecution, injustice, and torture from which
refugees flee, as well as the hardships they face in the U.S. They noted
that this bipartisan bill, urged by faith-based, immigrant rights, and
anti-poverty groups across the country, also received support from the
Social Security Administration.
[Read more.]
|
|
New on NILC’s Website (since
June 21, 2007) |
|
Featured Items |
|
|
■
Facts About Federal Preemption
(Local Law Enforcement Issues page).
“. . . Almost all of the proposed
state and local initiatives are preempted by the federal government's
exclusive authority to regulate immigration and are therefore
unconstitutional.
“This fact sheet explains general
preemption principles and provides immigrant rights advocates with
analytical tools for determining whether anti-immigrant initiatives proposed
in their states and localities can be legally challenged on preemption
grounds.”
>>
www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/LocalLaw/federalpreemptionfacts_2007-06-28.pdf
■
Immigrant Eligibility for Disaster Assistance (Community Education page).
Fact sheet prepared by NILC, National Council of La
Raza, and the American Red Cross. Translations in Chinese, Korean,
Spanish, and Vietnamese forthcoming.
>>
www.nilc.org/ce/nilc/disasterassist_immeligibility_2007-06.pdf |
|
Low-Income Immigrant Rights Conference |
|
|
■
6th National Low-Income Immigrant Rights
Conference: December 6-8, 2007 (6th National Conference: December 6-8, 2007
information page).
Who are the conference conveners? The
conference information page now lists the organizations that are serving as
co-conveners and provides links to their websites.
>>
www.nilc.org/dc-conference2007.htm |
|
Immigration and Detention Issues |
|
|
■
Senate Immigration Reform Bill: NILC Statement on the Thursday, June 28,
Cloture Vote (Comprehensive Immigration Reform page).
“We are extremely distressed by the course of
events leading to the 46-53 defeat of comprehensive immigration reform in
the Senate this morning. Not because we supported passage of the bill under
debate -- we did not -- but because the state of discourse over immigration
and the choices given to the American people have become so poor. . . .”
>>
www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/CIR/cir028.htm
■
U.S. Immigration Detention System: Substandard Conditions of Confinement and
Ineffective Oversight (Arrest and Detention page).
“The U.S. government has failed to promulgate
binding minimum standards for the conditions of confinement for detained
immigrants. In addition, it has failed to ensure that detention
facilities comply with the nonbinding standards that exist. . . .”
>>
www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/arrestdet/UNspecialrapporteur_
presentation_2007-05-03.pdf
■
Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication (Asylum, Refugee, and Other Protected Statuses page).
By Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Andrew Schoenholtz, and Philip
G. Schrag, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, 2008, available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=983946.
From the abstract: "The analysis reveals significant disparities in
grant rates, even when different adjudicators in the same office each
considered large numbers of applications from nationals of the same country.
In many cases, the most important moment in an asylum case is the instant in
which a clerk randomly assigns an application to a particular asylum officer
or immigration judge." (See also: Julia Preston, "Big Disparities in Judging
of Asylum Cases," New York Times, May 31, 2007.)
>>
http://ssrn.com/abstract=983946
■
Testimony of DREAM Students before the House Subcommittee on Immigration,
Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law, May 18, 2007 (Immigrant Student Adjustment / DREAM Act page).
Testimony of Marie Nazareth Gonzalez (Westminster
College, Class of 2009); Martine Mwanj Kalaw (Hamilton College, Class of
2003; The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse
University, Class of 2004); Tam Tran (University of California, Los Angeles,
Class of 2006). Read the transcripts or watch the hearing on
RealPlayer.
>>
www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/DREAM/index.htm#stories
■
2005 American Community Survey and Census Data on the Foreign Born by State (Immigration Law & Policy Index page).
On the Migration Policy Institute website.
State-specific fact sheets about the demographic & social, language &
education, workforce, and income & poverty characteristics of the
foreign-born population.
>>
www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/acscensus.cfm
■
Immigration's Economic Impact (Immigration Law & Policy Index page).
Paper issued by the U.S. president's Council of
Economic Advisors, June 20, 2007.
>>
www.whitehouse.gov/cea/cea_immigration_062007.html |
|
Employment Issues |
|
|
■
The
Basic Pilot Program: Not a Magic Bullet (Employment Eligibility Verification and
Antidiscrimination Protections page).
>>
[ Superceded by "E-Verify: Not a Magic Bullet,"
www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/ircaempverif/e-verify_nomagicbullet_2007-09-17.pdf
]
■
Testimony of Tyler Moran before the House Committee on Ways and Means,
Subcommittee on Social Security, Hearing on Employment Eligibility
Verification Systems, June 7, 2007 (Employment Eligibility Verification and
Antidiscrimination Protections page).
“My testimony today will focus on (1) the limitations
of the current electronic employment verification system — the Basic Pilot
program — upon which most proposed EEVS are based; (2) a summary of the
impact of a flawed EEVS on the Social Security Administration (SSA) and on
foreign-born workers; (3) an explanation of what provisions must be included
in any mandatory EEVS; and (4) an analysis of the EEVS proposed in the 2007
House and Senate comprehensive immigration reform bills.”
>>
www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/ircaempverif/eevs_House_testimony_ 2007-06-07.pdf
■
Employment Verification: Challenges Exist in Implementing a Mandatory
Electronic Verification System (Employment Eligibility Verification and
Antidiscrimination Protections page).
U.S. Govt. Accountability Office Testimony before the
Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, House of
Representatives, Statement of Richard M. Stana, Director Homeland Security
and Justice Issues, GAO, June 7, 2007.
>>
www.gao.gov/new.items/d07924t.pdf |
|
Public Benefits Issues |
|
|
■
Overview of Immigrant Eligibility for
Federal Programs
(Immigrants and Public Benefits page).
Previously published article, updated July 2007.
>>
www.nilc.org/immspbs/special/overview_immeligfedprograms_ 2007-07.pdf
■
Guide to Immigrant Eligibility for Federal Programs: 3 updated tables (Guide Update page).
¶ Pages 122-23 | TABLE 10: State-Funded Medical
Assistance Programs
>>
www.nilc.org/pubs/guideupdates/tbl10_state-med-asst_2007-07.pdf
¶ Pages 126-27 | TABLE 11: State-Funded SCHIP Programs
>>
www.nilc.org/pubs/guideupdates/tbl11_state-SCHIP_2007-07.pdf
¶ Pages 134-35 | TABLE 12: State-Funded Food Assistance
Programs
>>
www.nilc.org/pubs/guideupdates/tbl12_statefood_2005-10_7-07.pdf |
|
|
|
|