The Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on June 9, 2006, the
release of two new sets of federal regulations that would aim to
improve worksite enforcement, reduce the employment of unauthorized
workers, and help prevent the alleged use of false Social Security
numbers (SSNs). In a
DHS Press Release,
Fact Sheet, and
Question and Answer piece, DHS describes its proposed
regulations that provide guidance for employers to follow when
handling "no-match" letters received from either the Social Security
Administration (SSA) or DHS. The proposed regulations were
published on June 12, 2006, and interested parties have 60 days from
that date within which to submit comments on them.
The SSA sends no-match letters to a worker and his or her
employer to notify them when the worker has not received credit for
earnings in the previous tax year as reported by the employer on the
W-2 form. When a worker's W-2 contains a name or Social
Security number that does not match the SSA's records, the earnings
withheld from the worker's pay for social security go into the SSA's
Earnings Suspense File and the worker does not get credit for them.
NILC, in conjunction with other
immigrant worker advocate organizations, will be providing comments to DHS on the
proposed regulations the agency has issued with regard to "no-match"
letters.
NEW "NO MATCH" RULE
The new DHS policy on "no-match"
letters would require that employers take certain steps upon receipt
of such a letter. The "reasonable steps an employer should take
when this occurs" include:
-
Checking the employers' records to
ensure that the "no-match"
or discrepancy is not a
result form a typographical or clerical error;
-
If there is an error, the employer
should resubmit the information to the relevant agency (SSA or
DHS);
-
If the discrepancy cannot be
resolved, the employer should "promptly" request the employee to
confirm that the employer's records are correct;
-
If the employer's records are not
correct, the employer should take the necessary steps to correct
the error with the appropriate agencies;
-
If the employee confirms that the
employer's records are correct, the "reasonable employer" would
ask the worker to contact the SSA to resolve the discrepancy;
-
If the employer is unable to
resolve the discrepancy within 60 days of receipt of the
"no-match" letter, then the employer should reverify the
individual's work authorization without using the documents that
were the subject of the "no-match" letter;
-
If the employer is unable to
resolve the "no-match," the employer may choose to terminate the
employment relationship or run the risk that DHS will find that
the employer had constructive knowledge of employing an
unauthorized worker in the U.S.
If an employer follows the procedures
listed above in good faith, the employer can be "assured" that it
will not be subject to sanctions. DHS maintains, however, that the
receipt of a "no-match" letter does not, in and of itself, indicate
that a worker is unauthorized, but states that an employer's failure
to follow the "reasonable steps" outlined above could subject the
employer to possible penalties.
NEW DHS "ELECTRONIC I-9 RULE"
DHS also announced a proposed
regulation designed to improve employment eligibility verification
by permitting employers to digitize the I-9
employment eligibility verification
form that is used to verify
workers' employment eligibility. Currently, employers are required
to keep the I-9 in hard copy. The new "Electronic I-9 Rule" would
allow employers to electronically record and store their I-9 forms.
The DHS rule will codify existing standards used by the Internal
Revenue Service for electronic storage of tax accounting records.
According to DHS, electronic storage of I-9 forms will enhance
Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE's) ability to perform
worksite enforcement.
These proposed regulations will also
be subject to a 60-day public comment period, although the I-9
regulation will become effective on an interim basis as soon as it
is published.
NILC'S CONCERNS WITH THE PROPOSED
RULES
NILC is concerned that if the
proposed regulations are implemented, authorized
workers will be unjustly fired
because SSA and DHS databases are
notoriously inaccurate, and that employers will use no-match letters
as a pretext for retaliating against and intimidating undocumented
workers. The proposed DHS regulations provide that employers may
terminate the worker who is the subject of a "no-match" letter if
the worker does not resolve the discrepancy within 60 days. If
this proposed regulation is adopted, many authorized workers may not
be able to resolve possible discrepancies within the required 60-day
period.
We believe it was counterproductive
for DHS to issue the press release and accompanying documents before
publishing the proposed regulations because it could have led to
employer confusion and fear. As we have seen in the past, employers
tend to act precipitously upon receiving "no-match" letters, usually
by taking adverse action against workers. Although these are
proposed regulations, employers will still be impacted by them.
Advocates should be prepared for many
more workers to be fired from their jobs based on the employer's
receipt of a "no-match" letter in the coming weeks.
Now that the proposed regulations have
been published in the Federal Register (71 FR 34281-85 (June 14,
2006)), NILC is drafting and disseminating model comments for
your organizations to submit or to sign on to. We will also be
scheduling a national conference call through the Low-Wage Immigrant
Worker (LWIW) Coalition to strategize on our collective responses to
these proposed regulations.
For more information, contact Monica Guizar at
guizar@nilc.org or 213-639-3900 x.123.