IMMIGRATION LAW & POLICY

Removal Procedures & Defenses

Immigration

Employment Issues

Public Benefits

Driver's Licenses

DREAM Act

Search

 

9th Circuit grants en banc rehearing and vacates ruling that invalidated reinstatement regulations

Immigrants' Rights Update, Vol. 19, Issue 8, December 22, 2005


     The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted en banc rehearing in Morales-Izquierdo v. Ashcroft.  In granting rehearing, the court also vacated the previous decision in the case, which was issued by a three-judge panel.  The panel decision had invalidated 8 CFR section 241.8, finding that the regulation allowing the Dept. of Homeland Security to reinstate a prior removal order without holding a hearing before an immigration judge violates the Immigration and Nationality Act (for a summary of the panel decision, see "9th Circuit Rules Reinstatement Regulations Violate the INA by Authorizing Removal Without a Hearing Before an IJ," Immigrants’ Rights Update, Dec. 22, 2004, p. 4).

     Morales-Izquierdo v. Ashcroft, 423 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2005) (order granting en banc rehearing and vacating prior decision at 388 F.3d 1299 (9th Cir. 2004)).

By Linton Joaquin, NILC executive director | joaquin@nilc.org

 

Home | About NILC | Publications | Community Education Materials
Immigrants & Employment | Immigrants & Public Benefits | Immigration Law & Policy
Trainings | Links